loader image

Request A Free Consultation

+60 17-316 8316

Property Friday: 3 Elements of Trespass to Land

3 ELEMENTS

1) Intention 2) Voluntary Act 3) Foreseeable Interference

 

 

1) Intention 🤔

The defendant must have INTENDED TO DO the act — not necessarily intended to trespass. Even a genuine mistake is no defence.

A man who cuts grass and unknowingly crosses the boundary commits trespass — he intended to mow, even if not to cross.

❗Rule: You are liable whether you know you are trespassing or don’t know you have no right to be there.

 

2) Voluntary Act 🖐️

The entry must be willful. If someone is PHYSICALLY PUSHED onto land by another person, they are not liable — the act was involuntary.

Being physically forced or carried onto land = not trespass. (Smith v Stone [1647])

 

3) Foreseeable Interference 👀

The intrusion must be a foreseeable consequence. The MAGNITUDE of the encroachment is irrelevant — any interference will do.

A 20-inch concrete foundation intrusion = full trespass. (Willcox v Kettel [1937])

 

Elements tested in Court 🧑‍⚖️

 

Basely v Clarkson (1682)

Defendant cut grass and drifted over boundary.

Held: Trespass — he INTENDED to mow, even if not to cross the line.

Intention = the act, not the wrong.

 

Terra Damansara v Nandex [2006]

Ground anchors drilled beneath plaintiff’s land.

Held: All 3 elements present (Intentional act, voluntary entry, foreseeable intrusion). Injunction granted.

 

 

For further information, please contact us at Miranda & Samuel:

  • Dato’ George Miranda (george@mirandasamuel.com)
  • Joy Sam Jia Qian (joy@mirandasamuel.com)
  • Alisyah Maisarah (alisyah@mirandasamuel.com)

 

🌐 Follow us for timely updates on legal news and insights:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/miranda-samuel/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mirandaandsamuel….

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mirandandsamuel…

 

– By George Miranda, Joy Sam Jia Qian, Alisyah Maisarah –

This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. It should not be used as a substitute for legal advice relating to your particular circumstances. Please note that the law may have changed since the date of this article.

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Miranda & Samuel
Advocates & Solicitors
Notary Public
Trade Mark Agents
FOLLOW US ON
Categories
Scroll to Top