Corporate Advisory
Our Services
- Commercial Contract Drafting and Reviews
- Corporate Legal Advice
- Licensing and Regulatory Compliance
- Information Technology
Our Experience
Over the past 30 years, we (and our lawyers), have advised on a full range of corporate advisory matters. These include capital markets, compliance, licensing matters, digital and tech matters, shareholder advisory etc.
Testimonials
Henry Cheang
Director of Sapphire Pavilion Limited
RECENT ARTICLES
Discover Our Latest News And Insights !
Property Friday: 8 Times Courts Removed Wrongful Caveats (Part 1)
⚖️Court Decisions Caveats have been consistently removed by the Malaysian…
Property Friday: How to Save a Property from Wrongful Caveats?
✨𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗬𝗲𝗮𝗿, 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗦𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗹𝗲𝘀! 📌𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝗙𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘆: 𝙃𝙤𝙬 𝙩𝙤…
The High Court Ruled Unpaid Maintenance Charges Do Not Justify Property Caveats Lodged by Management Corporation
In Ridzuan Sulaiman v Perbadanan Pengurusan Subang Square [2025] CLJU…
Business Common Sense Wins: Vacant Possession Clock Starts from First Approvals, Rules Federal Court
On 22nd October 2025, the Federal Court dismissed the Developer’s…
Landlords Beware: Automatic Tenancy Termination and Binding Consent Orders Can Bar Rent and Trespass Recovery Amid Government Acquisitions
In the case of Right Base Trading Sdn Bhd v…
A proud moment for our Firm as we celebrate the launch of Property Law by our Partner, Dato’ George Miranda.
Last Friday on 12th December 2025, we had the privilege…
Good Intentions Didn’t Save the JMB: Court of Appeal Imposes Liability for Obstructing Developer’s Works
In a significant decision on economic torts and strata management…
New Release: Property Law by Dato’ George Miranda
We’re excited to share that Property Law, authored by Dato’…
Property Defects Dispute: Key Evidence Lessons for Landowners and Developers from the High Court
In Tan Lian Hor v. Honhub Sdn Bhd [2025] CLJU…
Key Insight for Developers: Silence on DIBS Duration Extends the Obligation to Service Interest for Purchasers
The Court of Appeal in Encorp Iskandar Development Sdn Bhd…
Developer Held Liable for RM1.65M+ Over Agent’s GRR Promise Even When Silent in SPA
A ruling reinforcing principles of agency and misrepresentation in property…
Land Acquisition Alert: Federal Court Clarifies Scope of Appeals Under Proviso to Section 49(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1960
In Sistem Lingkaran Lebuhraya Kajang Sdn Bhd v Orchard Circle…
Property Law Shake-Up: High Court Rules Against Developer, Awards RM309,225 for Delayed Occupancy
In Daniel Ong Beng Chong & Anor v Alpine Return…
Court of Appeal Clarifies Delivery Period in SOHO Sale Agreements Commences from Initial Building Plan Approval in Icon City Development
In Icon City Development Sdn Bhd v Lee Kean Hwa…
Court of Appeal Upholds Developers’ Reliance on Ministerial Approvals in Special Economic Zone Projects in Medini Iskandar
In Tropika Istimewa Development Sdn Bhd v Wong Hang Fah…
Court of Appeal Held: No Mandamus or Transfer Order for Recovery of Land Against Government
In Semantan Estate (1952) Sdn Bhd v The Government of…
High Court Held: Developer Liable for Defects in Common Property
In Badan Pengurusan Bersama Subang Parkhomes v Zen Estates Sdn…
Registrar Liable for Negligent Registration of Fraudulent Land Title Change: A Wake-Up Call in Malaysia’s Digital Land Transformation
The Court of Appeal in Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Selangor v…
High Court Upholds Tribunal’s Ruling on Share Units and Maintenance Charges
In Suria First Holdings Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Joint…
Court of Appeal Clarifies Limits on MC Powers: Indemnity By-Law and Unequal Charges Declared Invalid
In Yong Kein Sin v Perbadanan Pengurusan Springtide Residences [2025]…
